Blog Archives

Is the Conservative Party truly the party of the working class?

Edited extracts from an article by MP Dawn Butler, responding to a claim by Minister Liz Truss

Her message to Theresa May: you delivered a caring speech on the steps of 10 Downing Street, but it is clear that it was nothing more than rhetoric and spin. The few it governs for are certainly not the working class . . .

Rents have sky-rocketed to ridiculous levels, with my constituents, in the worst cases, spending 70% of their wages on rent alone, whilst drivers on modest incomes – who need their car to get to and from work – continue to face misery at the petrol pump. In Brent, we have two very busy foodbanks and several soup and bread kitchens. This 19th century scenario is the sad reality for the working class in 21st century Britain.

Wages for the majority of people have continued to fall in real terms, whilst those at the top have seen their salaries soar

Living conditions in the UK are now at their lowest levels for 60 years, with hundreds of thousands of families relying on food parcels just to get by. Our hospitals are in crisis, hate crime has rocketed and homelessness has doubled.

And to compound the struggle, this government has been cutting services, such as money for pupils, access to justice and policing

This means that when you are being discriminated against at work, you will be less likely to be able to take your employer to court. Tribunal cases have plummeted by 70%. To the government this number represents success, but to me, these are hard-working people who have had the rug pulled from underneath them when it comes to getting proper recompense for their grievances. These are the signs of a government destroying the working conditions and protections of those who need it most.

Nearly one million people are on zero hours contracts which means, from month to month, they are in a panic to know if they can pay their rent on time or at all.

This government is openly deceiving the general public by claiming to be something they’re so clearly not. Whether you call it “alt-facts” or “fake news”, if such untruths are peddled often enough, people soon start to believe it may be true.

Conservatives have tried to force the trade union bill through parliament to silence and, ultimately, destroy trade unions. Why would they want to do this unless they wanted also to destroy the voice of the working class and important workers’ rights? How about the workers’ rights bill? The Tories wouldn’t allow a discussion in parliament of a bill which sought to protect the rights of the working class after Brexit. Features like working 48 hour weeks, holiday pay and maternity and paternity rights are all at risk due to us leaving the EU. The government appear to be running roughshod over them.

Dawn ends:

Throughout our history in power we have championed the working man and woman in establishing great working class systems, from the NHS to the minimum wage, and all equality legislation, tenets that have now become the fibre that gives our country its unity, fairness and strength. We defended SME businesses, created through a movement of working class men women and trade unions, all with a common goal of helping the many and not just the few.

 

Dawn Butler is MP for Brent Central

 

Advertisements

“Inequality is not inexorable”: MP Michael Meacher in the FT

michael meacher2In the FT on January 1st, MP Michael Meacher pointed out that the record of capitalism has been poor over the current decade: some 90% of the income gains have been appropriated by the top 1% at a time when average wages were stagnant or falling.

He added that growing inequality has been championed by some on the basis that if the rich gain, the benefits will percolate down through society, but that the trickle-down theory has been discredited – it doesn’t work, wealth actually steadily trickles up.

Meacher cites a book by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, The Spirit Level (2009), which demonstrates that the more unequal a society is, the greater the social pathology on more than a dozen counts.

He asserts that such inequality is not inexorable; his recommendation:

“The metric of reward is not universal across the income distribution. Different criteria apply:

  • collective bargaining for wage-earners,
  • private contracts for white-collar workers,
  • and often self-appointed remuneration committees at the top, with excessively generous incentive schemes that bear little or no connection with reality.

“What is needed is the development of a single system of remuneration for calibrating rewards at all levels, plus much greater transparency in the process”.

.