Blog Archives

Will the government stop recruiting adolescents to the armed forces?

David Collins, a Committee member of the Movement for the Abolition of War of Friends of Le Monde Diplomatique and of Veterans For Peace UK, has drawn attention to a video on VfP’s website, “Made in the Royal Navy”, published by Child Rights International Network (CRIN). The film charges the British army with intentionally targeting young people from deprived backgrounds for the most dangerous front-line jobs. It plays on the natural anxiety in boys and young men about how they are going to become a man and go out into the world. Its message is that the Navy will remake the raw youth into a heroic version of the inadequate boy that they once were.

The actual experience of most of these youngsters is set out in a report published in August 2019: Conscription by Poverty? Deprivation and army recruitment in the UK.

This is a long-standing concern of many on our mailing list. In 2011, Britain’s child soldiers – 2 reminded readers that, twelve years earlier, the BBC had reported the British Army was being urged by the United Nations to stop sending young soldiers into war.

Following Symon Hill’s work in The Friend, the Ekklesia website, and a Nato Watch article, an article by Michael Bartlet, Parliamentary Liaison Secretary for Quakers in Britain, pointed out that “with the exception of Russia, and apprentices in Ireland, the British Army is unique in Europe in recruiting at the age of 16. Of 14,185 recruits into the army last year, 3,630 or over 25%, joined under the age of 18 . . . Deprivation and army recruitment in the UK . . . Those joining the army at the age of 16 often come from the poorest and least educated backgrounds. Some have reading ages of a child of half that age. They lack the confidence to seek a change in their career in the same way as those training for professions.” 

Ian Davis, the Director of NatoWatch, sent a reference to the post by Symon Hill, now placed on its website. He added that the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, together with War Child, UNICEF UK, the Children’s Society, and the Children’s Rights Alliance for England are calling for the Armed Forces Bill to be amended to end the “outdated practice” of recruiting soldiers aged under 18, a call backed by Amnesty International UK and the United Nations Association.

Five years later Quakers in Scotland and ForcesWatch presented a petition to the Scottish Parliament calling for greater scrutiny, guidance and consultation on the visits of armed forces to schools in Scotland. Over four-fifths of state secondary schools in Scotland were visited by the armed forces in a two-year period, according to a 2014 ForcesWatch report.

A 2016 report by public health charity Medact found that soldiers recruited aged 16 and 17 were twice as likely to be killed or injured when in combat compared to those enlisted when aged 18 or over. Medact also found that they were more likely to commit suicide, self-harm, abuse alcohol and develop post-traumatic stress disorder than older recruits

In May this year, the BMI Journal reviewed an article: Adverse health effects of recruiting child soldiers, published in February. It rejected the main justification resting on fears of a ‘recruitment shortfall’: saying that given the extensive harms described in its report, to put recruitment figures above the health and well-being of children and adolescents seems misguided and counterproductive for both the Ministry of Defence as a governmental body and wider society.The second justification alleging economic and occupational benefits to recruits, many of whom come from disadvantaged backgrounds was also rejected:

“(W)e have seen that it is precisely child recruits from disadvantaged backgrounds who are at highest risk of adverse outcomes in the military. Furthermore, figures from 2017 show that those recruited under the age of 18 constituted 24% of those who voluntarily left the Armed Forces before completing their service—this also increases the likelihood of lower mental health outcomes”.

It supported the views of those of the fourteen organisations mentioned here, recommending that the UK end its practice of recruiting adolescents to the armed forces.

 

 

 

 

o

War: the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the corporate-political world’s ‘most vicious racket’?

 

 The glory 

NMA Guide

A service will be held at the National Memorial Arboretum to dedicate a new memorial to the 255 Britons who died in the Falklands War and – in a radio interview – a senior military man who had served at the time said that his stance on that war  had now changed. 

One reason was that far more Falklands veterans had committed suicide than the  258 killed in action. 

This is relevant to the revulsion some feel when reference is made in memorials to ‘the glorious dead’ believing that, in fact, most of these lives were tragically wasted. 

The Telegraph has reported that veterans continue to be failed as they to wait for treatment by NHS psychiatrists and are refused priority treatment. For more information read a paratrooper’s reflections here.  

 

The waste 

 

Journalist Ed Brayton, a Fellow of the Center for Independent Media and co-founder/ president of Michigan Citizens for Science, quotes USA General Eric Shinseki, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, who points out that several studies have shown suicides are still on the rise among youths who have left the military, with 20% of about 30,000 suicides in the United States each year are committed by veterans – an average of 18 each day. 

People who are unconditionally anti-war just haven’t been outraged enough 

Ed added: “There’s an easy way to prevent this from happening: Stop starting unnecessary wars” but ‘Art’ made a more downbeat comment on this prescription: “You can work on eliminating war on your own time. And join the long list of people who have tried over the last couple of thousand years. Give it time. People who are unconditionally anti-war just haven’t been outraged enough.” 

War is a racket

Art referred to the ongoing relevance of a book written by United States Marine Corps Major General Smedley D. ButlerWar Is A Racket, in which he gives many examples of industrialists subsidised by the taxpayer were able to generate substantial profits from war. Its five chapters are headed:

  • War is a racket
  • Who makes the profits?
  • Who pays the bills?
  • How to smash this racket!
  • To hell with war!
Its key summary: 

“War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives . . . 

“Only a small ‘inside’ group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.”

Far more people should become sufficiently enraged – and join the Movement for the Abolition of War!