Following the summary of yesterday’s article by the Times’ Jenni Russell, a second analysis is made by John Wight in the Huffington Post article. He writes:
“The liberal order has collapsed and no one should mourn its demise, for on its tombstone is engraved the disaster of Afghanistan, the murder of Iraq and Libya, and the unleashing of an upsurge in global terrorism and religious fanaticism on the back of the destabilisation wrought across the Middle East in the wake of 9/11. Married to a refugee crisis of biblical dimension and the closest we have ever been to direct military confrontation with Russia since the Cold War, these are the fruits of this liberal order abroad.
“Meanwhile at home its moral and intellectual conceit has produced obscene levels of inequality, alienation, and poverty, exacerbated by the worst economic recession since the 1930s and the implementation of that mass experiment in human despair, otherwise known as austerity, in response.
“Tony Blair, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton epitomise this failed liberal order – leaders who perfected the art of speaking left while acting right, presenting themselves as champions of the masses, of ordinary working people, while worshipping at the altar of the free market, cosying up to the banks, corporations, and vested interests”.
- Are Brexit and Donald Trump ‘unleashing the dogs of racism and bigotry’ as John Wight fears?
- Is hope in Jeremy Corbyn lost? Wight thinks he failed to understand the danger posed by Brexit and mounted a dispassionate and lacklustre nature of the campaign.
- Was the manner in which Bernie Sanders folded his tent after Hillary Clinton won the Democratic Party nomination in decidedly dubious circumstances was tantamount to a betrayal of the passion, commitment and hope that millions across America had placed in him?
He emphasises that politics is not a mere parlour game and says that both Jeremy Corbyn and Bernie Sanders are fully deserving of criticism for taking positions and an approach which has suggested that for them it is, continuing:
Agreed, but there are better prescriptions than those he outlines in his final paragraphs.
Jenni Russell sees ‘the anguished question’ as being how to remedy the acute problems of inequality, while keeping the engines of capitalism working.
Should we instead try the engines of co-operation, peacebuilding, mutuality and increasing self-provision?
In a surprising report in the Huffington Post, David Ward’s comments were first said to liken the holocaust to the current atrocities carried out by Israel in Palestine – but his reported words later in the article show that he did not. He actually said:
“I have just returned from my second Holocaust day signing. We have had a big event in Bradford. Everybody talks about this awful, awful time we must never forget and always say we must learn lessons.
“I’ve been to Gaza and seen for myself what is, in effect, apartheid. I think it needs to be discussed.
“Having visited Auschwitz twice – once with my family and once with local schools – I am saddened that the Jews, who suffered unbelievable levels of persecution during the Holocaust, could within a few years of liberation from the death camps be inflicting atrocities on Palestinians in the new State of Israel and continue to do so on a daily basis in the West Bank and Gaza.”
Others who have visited this area confirm that Palestinian civilians suffer deprivation, humiliation and many have died in military strikes.
Even Gush Shalom, Israel’s peace movement, insists that Israel is committing war crimes on a daily basis
Why is there this hysterical reaction to the facts in Britain? Who orchestrates it?
John Bunzl is a businessman with a simple and powerful new vision for global governance. In 2000 he founded the International Simultaneous Policy Organisation (ISPO) and launched the Simultaneous Policy (Simpol) campaign. Ever since the Simpol campaign started John Bunzl has worked tirelessly to reach out to citizens, activists, non-governmental organisations, politicians and business people to raise both their awareness and understanding of what global simultaneous policies could mean for humanity, prosperity and peace. Here are extracts from his recent article in the Huffington Post:
It’s ironic no mention of climate change was made in the recent U.S. presidential TV debates given the east coast just got hammered by Hurricane Sandy– just the kind of extreme storm climate scientists have been warning could become more intense as climate warming evaporates more water into the atmosphere and so feeds storms more likely to develop into hurricanes.
But despite the disruption and economic cost and devastation, the truth is neither Republicans nor Democrats see any political mileage in the climate issue. As David Roberts explains, “The right is united in implacable opposition to all solutions. Burdened with so many coal states, the [Democratic] coalition doesn’t have the votes to overcome the right’s opposition. So there’s just nothing to say. There’s no margin in talking about it.”
There’s very widespread scientific agreement that climate change is occurring. But much of the argument and opposition revolves around whether it is human-induced or not. Surely what matters is the effect climate change is having – and will have – and that we respond robustly to it; not whether it was we humans, or solar flares, that caused it. After all, identifying non-human phenomena as the cause would hardly make the effects any less catastrophic!
Blame-games aside, right-wing opposition, whether in the U.S. or elsewhere, often centers on concerns over the economic costs and their effect on national competitiveness: the concern that acting decisively to cut carbon emissions will only see domestic costs rise and thousands of U.S. jobs go elsewhere while already-glacial growth would slow to a complete halt. And in reality, this is the key concern shared by the Left too, not only in the U.S., but all over the world. As the center-left former UK prime minister, Tony Blair, once said, “The blunt truth about the politics of climate change is that no country will want to sacrifice its economy in order to meet this challenge”.
The real question, then, is how do we make it in every nation’s interests to cooperate in responding to climate change? And how can ordinary citizens who care about the issue get it firmly back on the political agenda? That, precisely, is what a global UK-driven citizens campaign called the Simultaneous Policy (Simpol) is starting to do in a number of countries around the world. And the way it’s doing it could be of considerable relevance to the U.S.
Simpol calls for virtually all nations to act simultaneously on climate change and on many other global issues, because if all nations act simultaneously across multiple issues, no nation need lose out. Not only would nations that might lose on one issue gain on another, simultaneous action would break the vicious circle of fear and inaction all nations are presently caught in, so opening the way to cooperative action that’s in everybody’s interests. But here’s the rub: Citizens who support the campaign have declared they will vote in future elections, not for one side or the other, but for ANY politician or party – within reason – that has committed to implement Simpol’s range of policies if and when all or sufficient other nations have also signed up . . .
(B)oth opposing candidates would be obliged to sign on, so placing climate change firmly back on the political agenda regardless of who won the election, and regardless of any funding for either side provided by vested or corporate interests.
Sound far-fetched? You may think so. But Simpol is already making in-roads in countries across Europe and elsewhere.
Here in the UK 200 parliamentary candidates signed on to the campaign during the last national election. 24 are now Members of the UK Parliament.
Could this be a solution to swing voting in the UK and around the world? Some Members of Parliament in the European Union, Australia and elsewhere have also signed on.
With the current political deadlock on climate change in the U.S. and Hurricane Sandy wreaking havoc and destruction, it may only be a matter of time before Simpol makes an impact in the U.S. too. So it could just be the political game-changer many have been waiting for.#
Read the whole article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/john-bunzl/swing-voters-mr-president_b_2064072.html