As Glasgow’s Daily Record put it: “Cameron had no good answers and looked like a PM finally being held to account for the all damage his policies are doing. It really was an absolutely terrible day at the office for David Cameron. And quite possibly the day when Tories started taking Jeremy Corbyn seriously”.
As even the right-wing press salutes Jeremy Corbyn’s questions in Wednesday’s PMQs, two of the Telegraph’s journalists – hopefully their worst – pounce.
- One is Dan Hodges, who describes himself as a ‘tribal neo-Blairite’.
Dan has been a parliamentary researcher, a Labour Party official, GMB official, and as director of communications for Transport for London under Ken Livingstone. He left the party in 2013 after the government lost a crucial vote in the House of Commons which was designed to pave the way for a military intervention in Syria. Nice guy.
He writes: “The Lords are in open revolt. Caesar has been brought low. Or George Osborne, who has a haircut remarkably similar to Caesar’s, has been brought low. The barbarians are at the gates. Jeremy Corbyn has finally had a decent PMQs, using the tax credits issue to back David Cameron into a corner”.
He later refers to “Jeremy Corbyn’s besting of David Cameron at PMQs”
Reading around one gathers his attempted ‘downing’ of Osborne and Cameron is due to his support for Boris Johnson, first shown when he voted for him in the London Mayoral elections.
- The other is Angela Epstein, a columnist for the Jewish Chronicle and some right-wing British publications
Under the title, ‘Jeremy Corbyn is too thick to be Prime Minister’, she focusses on his exam results and lack of what she calls ‘natural talent’. It appears that she is a person whose disapproval amounts to an accolade. Read this devastating analysis of her mindset by Kate Smurthwaite, comedian.
Attacks by such people only highlight Corbyn’s decency and the popular welcome for the Labour Party’s policies for building a fairer society and redeeming Britain’s besmirched international reputation.
Compare Jeremy Corbyn’s record with that of the many ‘highly educated’ psychopaths in and out of power. They have successfully connived at the deaths and destruction in so many countries of late – whilst increasing their fortunes by their alliance with subsidised arms traders, multinationals who have taken over most of Britain’s energy, health, water, financial, communications and transport services and those who periodically attempt to make the struggling taxpayer accept mass medication (fluoride, statins, the polypill) GM technology, nuclear power stations, polluting incinerators and fracking – totally disregarding the welfare of the 99%.
‘Political bullies’ ally with corporates to advocate a profitable, stodgy, quick-and-easy GM ‘fix’ for Asia’s poor
According to long-term advocate of genetically modified crops, Robin McKie, in the Observer online, the ‘golden rice’ theory is gaining ground, superseding the ‘GM will feed the world myth’ for the moment.
It is proposed that children should ‘obtain’ Vitamin A by eating GM golden rice, though the vitamin occurs in a wide range of fruit, vegetables, milk, cheese, and eggs, foods which also offer a wide range of other valuable nutrients.
Rianne sent a link to an article by John Vidal, who is not convinced about a technology which benefits only ‘the few’, and writes:
“After tens of billions of dollars of public and private research and development money have been spent by some of the world’s most powerful companies . . . Only a handful of GM food crops such as maize, soy and oilseed rape are grown widely and mostly in only a few countries”. Other points made:
- the business is in the grip of a few global chemical companies who make their profits mostly from the sale of the chemicals they engineer their seeds to resist;
- most of the foods are fed to animals, not humans, and no clinical trial of any genetically modified crop has ever been published;
- toxicity trials are designed and conducted in semi-secret by the companies themselves and the regulators have concentrated on the crops’ environmental effects;
- any reports of serious illnesses in humans are routinely dismissed as “bad science”.
Vidal concludes that the promoters of the technology have relied on political bullying to give us promises rather than better products. He reproaches the GM industry for offering only more chemicals, more expensive seeds and patents to protect corporates and – more positively – asserts that advances in conventional farming have at least matched and possibly exceeded anything achieved by GM.
The full article may be read here.