Blog Archives

SIMPOL: a smaller party ? No – a political strategy offering you two votes . . .

simpol logoSimpol invites citizens to use their votes in a particular way to influence politicians towards accepting and ultimately implementing global justice policies.

They are actually offered the chance of TWO votes. The SECOND vote is the one electors have on May 7th and it’s fine as far as it goes, but it won’t do much to solve urgent global problems. By signing the Simpol Petition BEFORE May 7th, the elector gets a FIRST vote.

The Simultaneous Policy (Simpol) campaign invites  citizens in the UK, and citizens around the world, to use votes in a powerful new way to encourage politicians to solve global problems, including:

  • financial market regulation,
  • corporate tax avoidance
  • environmental destruction,
  • war
  • social injustice
  • climate change,
  • and global poverty.

Simultaneous implementation of the relevant policies would ensure that no country became uncompetitive as a result of pursuing policies that were right for the planet and which embodied people’s higher aspirations.

To read about MEPs and MPs who have signed click on these links:

We find that Simpol is also active in these countries:

Simpol Norway. Contact: Tore Hofstad

Simpol Netherlands. Contact: Tijmen Brozius

dirk weller simpolSimpol Italy. Contact: Gianpaulo Guglielmone

Simpol Iceland. Contact: Arni Karlsson

Simpol Germany (co-ordinator Dirk Weller, left)

Simpol Portugal: 


Candidates standing in signatories’ constituencies will be immediately informed that on May 7th these voters will be giving preference to those that support Simpol, to the probable exclusion of those who don’t. If they want these votes, they’ll see the need to confirm their support for Simpol before the election!

Simpol invites all to sign the Simpol Petition now to vote for global justice; to vote to drive all politicians towards cooperating globally.




Prophet with track record: anti-establishment anger in the western world

Gillian Tett, Financial Times capital markets editor at the time, warned about the state of the credit markets for at least a year before the crisis; she was one of the few who predicted the 2008 economic catastrophe.

gillian tettNow U.S. managing editor of the FT, she writes:

“Anti-establishment anger is bubbling up elsewhere in the western world”. She sees a rejection of mainstream parties and the ‘organs of politics’ in America.

What explains this malaise? Tett points only to the rise of the internet and social media:

“Back in the days of President Kennedy, the only way that most people could hope to participate in political change or make their views known was via a political party or demonstration.

Today, people can express ideas at any time via social media. “In some ways, this creates a very engaged and noisy society; protests are spreading like wildfire, as cyber “flash mobs” congregate over all manner of issues”.

american hubris2She does not even hint at the roots of anger and disgust at the fruits of western (aka Anglo-Saxon) politics:

  • crony capitalism with its revolving door’
  • rising economic inequality;
  • healthcare, transport, water, fuel and energy privatised for profit not service’;
  • taxpayers money spent on armaments;
  • the shame of drones illegally killing civilians and ‘targets’ in other countries;
  • the young sent to wage wars of benefit only to arms manufacturers and other vested interests;
  • pollution and destruction of the environment for profit;
  • wilful ignoring the long-term consequences of all these actions.

Does Gillian Tett underestimate ‘the people’:

“[T]he problem with this engagement is that it tends to be short term, volatile and based around single issues. It is hard to turn cyber flash mobs into a party campaign”. She correctly adds: reversing this tide of antipathy . . . will take more than a new election (or two) or social media posts”.

What effective course of remedial action can anti-establishment anger take?