Category Archives: uncategorized

Media 102: the astonishing and relentless campaign to stop Jeremy Corbyn, a moderate leftist, from becoming Prime Minister

The greatest fear of those holding the most power and wealth is that they will lose their exalted position in the world. They will resist any changes to the grossly unequal and unjust class structure that causes grievous damage to so many people; and to the planet itself. Even the threat of real change must be crushed. This, in a nutshell, underpins the astonishing and relentless campaign to stop Jeremy Corbyn, a moderate leftist, from ever becoming Prime Minister.
On July 10, BBC broadcast an episode of Panorama that purported to be an impartial investigation into the loaded question, ‘Is Labour Anti-Semitic?‘ It quickly became clear that the programme makers were not interested in a serious appraisal of the evidence and that the question was merely rhetorical. The thrust of the programme was that Labour is anti-semitic. The Labour Party response was scathing:
The Panorama programme was not a fair or balanced investigation. It was a seriously inaccurate, politically one-sided polemic, which breached basic journalistic standards, invented quotes and edited emails to change their meaning. It was an overtly biased intervention by the BBC in party political controversy. An honest investigation into antisemitism in Labour and wider society is in the public interest. The Panorama team instead pre-determined an answer to the question posed by the programme’s title.
The programme was presented by BBC journalist John Ware who had previously made clear his antagonism towards Corbyn’s politics.  Read the evidence here.
The Panorama programme was immediately followed by BBC News at Ten which gave it extensive coverage, pumping up the propaganda value of the fake ‘investigation’. (Ed) giving BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg a chance to redeem her previous failed inquisition of the now absent Corbyn which may still be seen here. This led to the BBC being censured for breach of accuracy and impartiality rules with the 2017 News At Six report by Laura Kuenssberg on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
The experienced journalist Peter Oborne said via Twitter: ‘I proposed to the BBC a documentary on Tory Islamophobia three years ago. Zero interest.’ And as Asa Winstanley observed:
all the program proved was just how dishonest the British establishment and the Israel lobby have been in manufacturing this “Labour anti-Semitism crisis” for the past four years.
As so often happens when a corporate journalist ventures forth into the world of social media, rebuttals flew in. Twitter user Jon Harding replied:
Members support Corbyn because he supports our values – community, equality, responsibility, solidarity and fairness. The media attack us every day, calling us anti-Semitic. But Corbyn remains steadfast, and support for Corbyn is solid, because we can see through the smears.
An article on the Skwawkbox website noted that of the 64 Lords who signed the advert, at least twenty-four are corporate lobbyists or on boards of hedge funds, banks, “global security consultancies” and, particularly, private health firms. Others have family links to similar enterprises.
Media Lens comments, these are the primary interests which are being protected in attacking Corbyn, ending: “The root cause of this campaign to destroy Corbyn is to block any hope of systemic change for the benefit of the general population. Such a prospect is deemed unacceptable to established power. For the sake of society, and the larger battle to prevent climate breakdown, we urgently need to take back power from those who who have stolen it”.

Media 101: Pre-Panorama reaction: BBC haven’t covered Gaza for last 5 months, Sky for last 18 months

Attention has just been directed towards a message from one who saw Ilan Pappé speak at the weekend. He didn’t mention the forthcoming Panorama programme but in relation to coverage of anti-semitism in Labour Party said that the BBC haven’t covered Gaza for last 5 months and Sky for last 18 months.

An online search reveals that Professor Ilan Pappé – an expatriate Israeli historian and socialist activist – is currently at the University of Exeter as director of the university’s European Centre for Palestine Studies and co-director of the Exeter Centre for Ethno-Political Studies. He supports the one-state solution, which envisages a binational state for Palestinians and Israelis.

Pappé is one of Israel’s New Historians and the link given is well worth using. Since the release of pertinent British and Israeli government documents in the early 1980s, they have been rewriting the history of Israel’s creation in 1948, and the corresponding expulsion or flight of 700,000 Palestinians in the same year. He has written that the expulsions were not decided on an ad hoc basis, as other historians have argued, but constituted the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, in accordance with Plan Dalet, drawn up in 1947 by Israel’s future leaders. He blames the creation of Israel for the lack of peace in the Middle East, arguing that Zionism is more dangerous than Islamic militancy, and has called for an international boycott of Israeli academics.

His work has been both supported and criticized by other historians. Before he left Israel in 2008, he had been condemned in the Knesset, Israel’s parliament; a minister of education had called for him to be sacked; his photograph had appeared in a newspaper at the centre of a target; and he had received several death threats.

In relation to coverage of anti-semitism in Labour Party, Pappé said Corbyn supporters appearing on TV should use the opportunity to educate people on Palestine about the current death toll of Palestinians & the Nakba – the commemoration of the displacement of Palestinians that preceded and followed the Israeli Declaration of Independence in 1948.

At least 96 Palestinians (20 of them children) and 17 Israelis were killed by someone from the other side in 2017. Their photographs and the circumstances of their deaths are given on this timeline.

Palestinian Arabs are Semites, so could the BBC be arraigned as anti-semitic because of their failure to report these deaths?





Media 100: predicted BBC Panorama ‘bombshell’ for Corbyn, Wednesday 10th

The impartial BBC heads its programme announcement with this photograph:

A Daily Mail headline, Labour civil war explodes as party braces for bombshell TV probe, refers to a Panorama ‘investigation’ on Wednesday, Is Labour Antisemitic? It is to include claims by Tom Watson and Sam Matthews, who spent two years as head of Labour’s disputes unit from 2016 to 2018. An online search failed to produce any biodata or image of Mr Matthews but over time there has been concern about his performance in office – a ‘rogue staffer’. Leaked emails from the disputes unit are said to validate these concerns:

Mr Matthews was sent evidence, a year before he left his post, of a Labour council candidate posting anti-semitic material. He issued a “notice of investigation” but did not suspend the member. Mr Matthews received more evidence months later indicating that the same member had posted an article on Facebook claiming that the Holocaust was a hoax but once again decided against a suspension. Only on March 22 2018, days after Ms Formby was elected as general secretary, did Mr Matthews and his unit agree to the member’s suspension. He finally acted after concerns were raised by Laura Murray, a Corbyn aide, who wrote exasperatedly: “Should he not be suspended pending investigation?”

The ‘silly season’ has seen intensified campaigns against Jeremy Corbyn every year since he became leader of the Labour Party. Ben Chacko lists them:

In 2016 the “chicken coup” saw a challenge to Corbyn’s leadership that took the heat off the Tories following David Cameron’s resignation.

2017, the election year, saw disloyal MPs attacking the leader throughout the campaign, though most were silenced by the party’s strong performance in the vote itself.

In 2018 allegations that the leadership is tolerant of anti-semitism quoted Margaret Hodg’s smears on Corbyn in Parliament and Labour’s NEC adopted a definition of anti-semitism rejected by its author for conflating racism with political criticism of Israel.

2019 The smear season has begun again and Labour is right to warn that this week’s Panorama drama will be a partisan hatchet job based on:

  • interviews with Corbyn’s political enemies,
  • suspended MP Chris Williamson
  • differences of opinion between Labour MPs as to whether to adopt the pro-Remain line advocated by deputy leader Tom Watson rather than maintain its commitment to delivering on the 2016 vote to leave the EU.

Shadow international trade secretary Barry Gardiner chides media organisations for obsessing over Labour divisions when the real dividing line in Britain is between the government of the richest and the rest of us – a divide that also runs through the Labour Party.






Will XR’s actions focus politicians’ minds?

Extinction Rebellion‘s spring rally in Bristol

Simon Pawley responds to a letter in the Financial Times, in which Helen Jackson describes the Extinction Rebellion movement as having ‘extra-democratic tendencies’, which deserve to be challenged.

He points out that one of Extinction Rebellion’s three central demands is for the creation of a deliberative citizens’ assembly to formulate recommendations that can inform debate about policy and enables ordinary citizens to get involved – a fundamentally democratic and constructive proposal.

The power exercised by industry’s lobbying of government – a recurring theme on this website – is highlighted by Pawley

Stressing that any realistic assessment of the battle for political influence must acknowledge industry’s “extra-democratic” force, he makes three points:

  • In private, some energy companies continue to resist regulations designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, notwithstanding their public commitment to renewable energy (BP is a recent example).
  • The energy industry has also distorted public debate by secretly funding climate change denial organisations.
  • Environmentalists cannot fund lobbying efforts on such a scale.

He ends, “Instead, their protests are attracting media attention and promoting discussion of how to address the crisis. This has rapidly begun to highlight the strength of public opinion on this issue; we may hope that this will focus the minds of politicians”.






FT editorial board and Corbyn agree: the Scunthorpe steel plant should not be abandoned


Together with the Port Talbot plant in south Wales, Scunthorpe is one of only two integrated steel producers in the UK. A third large steelworks in Redcar, in north-east England, closed in 2015.

If both of the remaining large blast furnaces close, the country’s workforce will lose essential skills as Britain’s construction and defence industry become dependent on foreign producers or smaller companies that import raw steel.

A wide spectrum of industries rely on stainless steel; for many applications it’s the most effective solution. Read more here. The most common uses of stainless steel include:

  • Architecture and Construction
  • Automotive and Transportation
  • Medical
  • Energy and Heavy Industries
  • Food and Catering

Britain is shifting to low-carbon energy and should not have to import steel from less green sources or outsource production to China.

The FT’s editorial believes that the state should not abandon the plant. While recognising that employment cannot always be preserved at all costs, it describes losing 5,000 jobs at the steelworks and another 20,000 supported by it as ‘a hammer blow to the working-class community of Scunthorpe and the broader North Lincolnshire region’.

The Labour Party has called on the government to take a public stake in British Steel if necessary, to protect jobs and support the UK’s infrastructure and renewable energy systems.

Former Scunthorpe steelworker Charlotte Childs said that the impact could be “immeasurable . . . Unemployment in North Lincolnshire at the minute is 4.8 per cent. If the steelworks goes that rises that to 8.4 per cent, which is double the national average. It’s not just the 4,000 workers that work on the steelworks or even the 20,000 people within the supply chain. It’s the ancillary businesses that rely on the steelworkers having a decent income and being able to spend that money within the leisure economy in the area.”

In another report she was quoted as adding: “Why is so little being done to help people? If a bailout is good enough for bankers, why isn’t it good enough for steelworkers?”





MMR: Why not allow the single vaccine option, in use elsewhere and widely accepted in ‘60s & ‘70s Britain?

Reblogged from Chemical Concern.






Press as agent provocateur? Journalist maligns XR demonstrators

Any sane person and organisation should now listen to the ‘wakeup call’ being made by protestors – after thirty years of warnings using ‘civilised’ methods by people like Mayer Hillman have gone largely unheeded by decision-makers.

Not so the Times which – in a (hopefully) unwitting challenge to police which could provoke violent action and reaction – has published articles alleging a triumphalist ‘boast’ by climate activists who ’bragged’ that police do not have the resources to stop them and that “The hollowed-out British state is overwhelmed”

But its link – given above – leads only to an article by its environment editor and HIS headline that ‘Police (are) overwhelmed by Extinction Rebellion protesters plotting to clog up justice system’.

Home Secretary Sajid Javid (firmly allied with the status quo after a career as a senior banker) has said: “Let me be clear — I totally condemn any protesters who are stepping outside the boundaries of the law. They have no right to cause misery for the millions of people who are trying to lead their daily lives. Unlawful behaviour will not be tolerated.”

Does he really view impeding a holiday flight (targeting Heathrow airport) as being more serious than floods, drought, storms and wildfires, intensified by climate change, killing and displacing people and other life forms?

Protesters want the government to take climate change seriously, enact legislation to reduce carbon emissions to net zero by 2025 and set up a citizens’ assembly to ensure action is taken.

Climate change deniers please note Joel Pett’s message: the actions proposed are in themselves socially, environmentally and – in the long term – economically beneficial.


If heeded, the activists will – at most – avert climate change and at least, as Pett points out, create a better world.





Media 96: Corbyn slurs, “a farrago of falsehood and insinuation” – principled Conservative trounces author, journalists and publisher

Richard House draws attention to an article by Peter Oborne reviewing a book, surprisingly. published by William Collins, a respectable publishing house. Oborne writes about this ‘ugly hatchet job’:

Dangerous Hero: Corbyn’s Ruthless Plot For Power, contains numerous falsehoods. It systematically omits relevant facts in order to portray Corbyn as a ruthless Marxist and anti-semite hell-bent on destroying Western liberal values”.

Peter Oborne – who describes himself as a frequent critic of Jeremy Corbyn states that Tom Bower’s book is not just intellectually dishonest, it is a farrago of falsehood and insinuation:

“The ugly truth is that Bower is not straight with his readers, let alone Corbyn. Again and again he withholds relevant information, with the result that the Labour leader and his colleagues come over in the worst possible light.” He adds:

“British journalists need to ask themselves a question. Is there something rotten in British media discourse which allows someone like Bower to get away with this?”

“Bower has made an astonishing number of factual errors – more than I have ever come across in a book from a mainstream publisher. While something has clearly gone horribly wrong with the editing process at William Collins, Bower is the author and must take full responsibility.

“This consistent inaccuracy is made worse by the fact that there are no references nor citations. Quotes are frequently provided without naming the source. Bower says that he does not provide references because he does not want to compromise those who have given him information. He also cites “legal reasons”, though he tantalisingly does not explain what they are.

“Time after time, Bower makes assertions that are not backed by any evidence. The problem is so bad that I resolved to carry out my own investigation into the truth of some of the assertions made in Bower’s book. This article is the result of my research. Again and again, I have been able to prove that his account of events is false, misleading and, in some cases, pure fabrication.” 

After giving at least twenty examples of Bowers’ falsehoods and fabricated or misleading charges, Oborne asks:

“Are British journalists allowing hostility to Corbyn to get in the way of telling the truth? Has there been a balanced discussion of the anti-semitism claims against Corbyn’s Labour? The warm reception for Tom Bower’s ugly hatchet job on the leader of the opposition suggests that something has gone badly wrong with British public life.

“We need to pause and reflect”.


Peter Oborne won best commentary/blogging in 2017 and was named freelancer of the year in 2016 at the Online Media Awards for articles he wrote for Middle East Eye. He also was British Press Awards Columnist of the Year 2013. He resigned as chief political columnist of the Daily Telegraph in 2015. His books include The Triumph of the Political Class, The Rise of Political Lying, and Why the West is Wrong about Nuclear Iran.


Ed: then put the whole sad game in perspective by reading some social media reactions and Martin Odoni’s added revelations – from: – but this link does not work now though accessed recently, see:media corbyn link

Odoni graphics include:

1 odoni






Disloyal, nakedly ambitious, Watson further assists the media campaign against his decent, honest leader


Francis Elliott and Kate Devlin report, in the Times, that Tom Watson declared “I am not Jeremy’s deputy” as he sought to distance himself further from the Labour leader.

The ‘badge of shame’ misleading/mischief making headline – not the first spotted in this newspaper – is belied by the text. Watson actually described the departure of Luciana Berger (MP for Liverpool Wavertree) as a “badge of shame”.

Watson as compassionate hero

He told the Emma Barnett programme on BBC Radio 5 Live: “It is a badge of shame that Luciana Berger, a bright young female pregnant MP, was bullied out of her own constituency by racist thugs. I’m not putting up with it. I owe it to the 500,000 members of the party to defend their integrity against claims that we are a racist party or we are not dealing with racism.”

He repeated similar charges in Sky News – close to crocodile tears as he ‘feared’ that more MPs would leave the Labour Party.

And confirms another subversive move:  his plans to arrange a group of MPs away from the shadow cabinet to create their own policies.






If the economy ‘tanks’ post-Brexit, will shopping mall and carpark revenues be enough to compensate for government cuts?

 “Years of chronic underfunding have left local government ‘on life support’ “

123 of England’s 353 councils sent information to the 2019 State of Local Government Finance survey, conducted by the Local Government Information Unit and Municipal Journal. Chris Tighe (possible paywall) reports that Jonathan Carr-West, chief executive of the LGIU, has warned of a future in which care for the elderly and for vulnerable children could be funded from shopping centre investments and car parks – “a significant risk if the economy ‘tanks’ “.

Survey findings include:

  • More than half of English councils will eat into their reserves.
  • Four out of five are investing in commercial developments to supplement their revenue this year to compensate for central government funding cuts.
  • Nearly half of the local authorities are planning to cut services.
  • Most will raise council tax this year and increase charges to stay afloat.
  • A quarter said planned cuts to services in the coming year would be noticed by the public.
  • 10 local authorities said they were concerned they would be unable to deliver the legal minimum service for residents.
  • Last year, Northamptonshire county council was given special permission to sell its head office and rent it back after running out of money.
  • Several other authorities have warned they are close to collapse.
  • 8 in 10 senior council decision makers believed the current system for council funding was unsustainable.
  • 82% were considering commercialising council services to raise extra money
  • and 57% wanted to sell council assets.
  • Children’s services and education were the top immediate financial pressures, for the second year running.
  • Adult social care is still under severe strain

Four out of five English councils are investing in commercial developments to supplement their revenue this year to compensate for central government funding cuts.

The government’s annual funding settlement for local authorities, outlined in December, assumed that every council in England would implement the maximum 4.99% council tax increase, including 2% ringfenced for adult social care, in 2019-20. Analysts say that would add around £80 to the annual average bill for a Band D, mid-market, home — currently £1,671. An additional £24 can be added to the charge to fund the local police force.

But the Local Government Association said the tax rise would not be enough to prevent service and job cuts after eight years of austerity. It said councils would have lost almost 60% of their central government funding between 2010 and 2020 and face an overall funding gap of £3.2bn in 2019/20.

Jonathan Carr-West warned: “In the future, care for the elderly and vulnerable children could be funded from shopping centre investments and car parks, which carries significant risk if the economy tanks.” This year’s government spending review would, the survey warned, be “make or break” for vital local services.