Incinerators 3: Weasel words from the Health Protection Agency & Norfolk exposure of flawed monitoring

 


weasel words cartoon

 Health Protection Agency: significant points highlighted:

The Health Protection Agency has reviewed research undertaken to examine the suggested links between emissions from municipal waste incinerators and effects on health. While it is not possible to rule out adverse health effects from modern, well regulated municipal waste incinerators with complete certainty, any potential damage to the health of those living close-by is likely to be very small, if detectable. This view is based on detailed assessments of the effects of air pollutants on health and on the fact that modern and well managed municipal waste incinerators make only a very small contribution to local concentrations of air pollutants. The Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment has reviewed recent data and has concluded that there is no need to change its previous advice, namely that any potential risk of cancer due to residency near to municipal waste incinerators is exceedingly low and probably not measurable by the most modern techniques. Since any possible health effects are likely to be very small, if detectable, studies of public health around modern, well managed municipal waste incinerators are not recommended.

Source: http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1251473372218

But if, as alleged, monitoring is seriously flawed, the HPA figures are worthless

Accurate base line monitoring is essential for establishing a reference point to measure future increases in air pollution. If particulate PM2.5 is found to be increased in the Urban Air this would be in breach of EU Directive 2008/50/EC and could lead to legal action forcing the (very expensive) closure of the incinerator. Directive 2008/50/EC  . . .

Base line monitoring equipment in West Norfolk is placed where it can be guaranteed not to detect an increase in future air pollution

To provide meaningful base line data the prevailing wind needs to be taken into account and air monitoring equipment located at varying distances downwind of the proposed incinerator, especially in the town of King’s Lynn, so compliance with Directive can be checked.

If monitoring equipment is not located with due care, it will fail to register increases in air pollution and could make it difficult to determine if air quality has deteriorated from pre-incinerator levels.

A freedom of information request has revealed on 11th March 2010 a representative of SKM Enviros held discussions with Council staff regarding base line monitoring.

incinerator monitoringThey currently have base line monitoring equipment in operation at the only place in West Norfolk where it can be guaranteed not to detect an increase in future air pollution.

Figure 1 is a recent photograph showing monitoring equipment operating at the intended location of the incinerator.

Figure 2 is a photograph of an operational incinerator to help illustrate why this location is inappropriate for recording base line air pollution.

incinerator monitoring 2The purpose of the tall incinerator chimney stack is to disperse the pollution away from the immediate site area. If an incinerator is constructed with an 8o meter tall stack the purpose of the stack is to disperse the pollution away from the immediate site area. Particulate Matter/emissions do not fall to earth like a stone as they leave the stack thus; it is evident whichever way the wind is blowing air quality at the base of the incinerator will always be free from any significant incinerator emissions whatever concentrations are emitted from the stack.

This point is illustrated by the X in a box at the bottom of figure 2 if this was the position of the County Councils’ emissions monitoring equipment it would be completely ineffective. If this location is used to monitor air quality before and after the incinerator is built any figures published will implying the incinerator is not contributing to air pollution. It will reinforce what the HPA believe to be true. Even if data collected at this location is only used as a contribution to a wider survey, it will bring the average reading down making the emissions appear cleaner than they really are.

East Anglian monitoring will not provide any meaningful data relating to the proposed incinerator.

incinerator monitoring  3

Figure 3 shows the 10 sites in East Anglia where fine particles PM2.5 are currently being monitored, they are not within the critical 16 mile of the proposed incinerator where the main deposition of fallout can be expected, they also will not provide any meaningful data relating to the incinerator.

Source: www.farmerscampaign.org/monitoring.html

 

 

Advertisements

Posted on February 23, 2013, in Civil servants, Corporate political nexus, Lobbying, Parliamentary failure, Vested interests and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: